Contixly Intent Platform

Intents —into justified decisionsand verifiable outcomes

Helping teams turn intents into justified, collaborative decisions and verifiable outcomes, by making knowledge about the system, its goals and the consequences of change available to the people involved.

  • Your code is never sent to the service
  • BYOK: your own agents, your own keys
  • Web console · desktop · knowledge base
  • For organisations with complex systems

Knowledge about the system lives in individual specialists' heads

Work is scattered, the grounds for decisions are lost, and the consequences of a change surface after release. Every new request rebuilds its context by hand — through people, chats and stale documents.

Context is rebuilt every time

Who owns the system, which goals are already committed, what breaks on change — each answer is found manually.

The need is replaced by a solution

The request arrives already framed as a solution. The original problem and expectations stay unstated.

Built it and forgot it

After release nobody checks whether the functionality is used and whether the original need was met.

Shared understanding instead of retelling

Contixly connects the intent, its grounds, the decision and the verification of its effect in one space available to everyone involved.

From an unclear request to a verified outcome

A useful outcome may also be an answer, a decision not to change anything, or a simplified business process — not necessarily code.

  1. 01

    Make sense of the request

    The requester's words are kept verbatim. The product helps separate the need from the proposed solution and state the problem.

  2. 02

    Find the context

    Which systems, owners and documents already touch the request. Grounds are shown together with links to their sources.

  3. 03

    Surface goals and conflicts

    A new intent is compared against active goals and commitments. Overlapping needs are visible before work starts.

  4. 04

    Prepare stakeholder participation

    Who must take part in the decision, in what role, and when they are available. Estimates are marked as a recommendation, not a guarantee.

  5. 05

    Pick the next step

    Investigate, align, change the process, implement, or do nothing. The decision is kept together with its grounds.

  6. 06

    Verify the result

    The goal stays attached to the change. After release you can see whether the functionality is used and the need is met.

A composite product around an analytical knowledge base

The knowledge base is the core of the product. The web part covers organisation management, projects and reports. The desktop part works with code and agents on the developer's machine.

WEB

Organisation, projects, reports

Intents, decisions and stakeholder participation in one team space. Permissions, audit and the organisation's access boundaries.

  • — Intents and decision records
  • — Participation and reviewer availability
  • — Project reports and audit
CORE

Analytical knowledge base

How the system is built, its goals, the grounds and the consequences of change. RAG, agents and interfaces address one core, within access boundaries.

RAGMCPLOCAL MODELS
DESKTOP

Code and agents stay local

Exploring how the system is built, what changed and what broke — on the developer's machine. The code stays in their environment.

  • — Local repository analysis
  • — Agents run in the developer's environment
  • — Changes linked back to the intent

Seven screens of one scenario

Pick a step or scroll the strip. The screens are built on the Contixly product design system.

Reduce onboarding friction

Clarify what the requester needs before anyone proposes a change.

Search ⌘K

Request, verbatim

“Onboarding takes too long. Let's add a second approval step so partners stop getting stuck.”
REQUESTER

Sales Ops · 2026-09-13T09:26:06Z

ATTACHED CONTEXT
  • Partner Registry · Platform
  • Approval Service · Compliance
  • Onboarding Flow · Product

Need and proposed solution, separated IN FOCUS

NEED

Partners are stuck in onboarding for 9 days on average.

PROPOSED SOLUTION

Add a second approval step.

UNKNOWN

Where the 9 days are actually spent.

Not yet verified

Your code is never sent to the service

The desktop part runs in the developer's environment. What crosses the boundary is meaning and structural metadata — not sources and not document contents.

Stays local
  • Source code and file contents
  • Document and conversation contents
  • Knowledge base embeddings and indexes
  • Secrets, keys and credentials
Crosses the boundary
  • Intents, decisions and grounds
  • Structural metadata about code: modules, edges, names
  • Links to sources without their contents
  • Audit events and telemetry

Your agents, your keys, your environment

Work on code runs through the agents your team already chose, on your team's own keys. Contixly does not proxy model calls and does not require your code or your keys to be handed to the service.

  • Keys stay with the organisationProvider credentials live in your environment, not in the service.
  • Your own agents and modelsConnected over MCP, including local models inside a protected environment.
  • Runs in the developer's environmentThe agent reads the repository locally. Only structure and meaning reach the service.

One context for people in different roles

Analysts

Work through intents with less dependence on hints from narrow specialists.

Requesters

Clarify the problem and expectations before the technical review, while still being able to propose a solution.

Developers

Explore how the system is built, what changed and what broke, on their own.

Leaders and stakeholders

Discuss options and follow initiatives without reconstructing the history by hand.

Helping teams turn intents into justified, collaborative decisions and verifiable outcomes, by making knowledge about the system, its goals and the consequences of change available to the people involved.

From knowledge in individual specialists' heads and scattered tasks — toward a shared understanding of the problem, the options and the work. From “built it and forgot it” — toward keeping the goal and checking the result.

The product is for organisations with complex information systems and is not limited to one industry. The knowledge base, RAG, interfaces and agents all serve the mission.

  1. Knowledge available to the team, not a personal adviser for one manager.

  2. Respect for the requester's business expertise; a need is not the same as a proposed solution.

  3. Verifiable grounds, visible unknowns and respect for access boundaries.

  4. Continuity between intent, decisions, execution and verification of effect, across people and tools.

  5. Small end-to-end experiments instead of building a perfect platform all at once.

Tell us about your case

We onboard organisations through small end-to-end experiments. Tell us what you would like to improve — we will reply personally with a proposed next step.

* Required fields. Please avoid confidential information.

We use your details only to review this request and reply personally. Read the Early-access privacy notice.